<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Overstatement - Latest Comments in A sign of the church&amp;#8217;s failure&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://bthooper.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bthooper.disqus.com/a_sign_of_the_church8217s_failure8230/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:53:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A sign of the church&amp;#8217;s failure&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://overstatement.org/?p=108#comment-13983135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think your post is right on and points to the issues we have with institutional survival: are we as the Church so interested in preserving our ecclesiastical and national institutions that we will also -- actively or silently -- support the institutionalized violence in our names?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mtcurry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:53:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A sign of the church&amp;#8217;s failure&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://overstatement.org/?p=108#comment-10163614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think that is the best comment I've ever seen on any blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I infer from your comments that you are sarcastic. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bryan Hooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A sign of the church&amp;#8217;s failure&amp;#8230;.</title><link>http://overstatement.org/?p=108#comment-10163432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What would Cormac McCarthy say about your inability to distinguish "infer" from "imply"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joiarib</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>